Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 366,688,192 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 11.0 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($33,931 compared to $37,550, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $35,444, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $86,573, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $51,447, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $53,950, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.4%), single female poverty (25.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), male poverty (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 9.7%), married-couple households (46.4% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households (69.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.010%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 37.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.2%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (95.1% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.15%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%).