Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Haiti Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,272,153 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.496. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Haiti. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 12.1 Immigrants from Haiti.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 31.6%), median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $36,203, a difference of 8.9%), and per capita income ($33,931 compared to $36,849, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $50,398, a difference of 0.050%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $84,018, a difference of 0.45%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $45,266, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.1%), single female poverty (25.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother poverty (34.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.0%), male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 16.0%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.9%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.39, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 100.0%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 89.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 62.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.5%), master's degree (9.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%).