Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,340,109 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.672. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $46,430, a difference of 36.8%), median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $42,229, a difference of 27.1%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $105,964, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $54,593, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $60,647, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.6%), family poverty (12.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.8%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (44.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 76.5%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 55.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 50.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 87.4%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 84.9%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 83.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.6%).