Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,134,405 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $48,747, a difference of 43.7%), median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $59,278, a difference of 31.9%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $110,137, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $53,990, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $62,292, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.4%), family poverty (12.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.40%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.8%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.8%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.80%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 66.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 63.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 41.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 107.6%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 105.1%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 93.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.9%).