Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,470,933 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $46,213, a difference of 36.2%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $105,655, a difference of 26.3%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $55,954, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $62,354, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.3%), family poverty (12.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.5%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.2%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 99.1%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 90.4%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 22.9%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%).