Immigrants from Mexico vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,833,139 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $55,573, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $84,085, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $53,077, a difference of 0.52%), median earnings ($39,114 compared to $38,907, a difference of 0.53%), and per capita income ($33,931 compared to $34,195, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (25.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 19.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (34.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.6%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 43.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.4%), family households with children (31.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.58, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.0%), bachelor's degree (26.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (86.2% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (79.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.070%), male disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.2%).