Immigrants from Mexico vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,952,967 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 11.8 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.5%), per capita income ($33,931 compared to $37,699, a difference of 11.1%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $35,930, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $53,232, a difference of 0.82%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $86,764, a difference of 2.2%), and median household income ($73,160 compared to $74,847, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 35.5%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.56%), single mother poverty (34.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.0%), family households with children (31.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 2.9%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.35, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.2%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.3%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.2%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.4%).