Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,481,586 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.726. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 24.1 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $42,950, a difference of 26.6%), median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $40,257, a difference of 21.1%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $100,256, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $50,609, a difference of 0.37%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $59,837, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.0%), family poverty (12.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.0%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.0%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and family households with children (31.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.83%), currently married (44.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 61.2%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 53.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 77.9%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 72.5%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%).