Immigrants from Mexico vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,653,122 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $39,558, a difference of 16.6%), householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $60,748, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $38,202, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $54,000, a difference of 7.1%), and median household income ($73,160 compared to $79,509, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.31%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 56.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.3%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 15.3%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and family households (69.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.8%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 113.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 147.2%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 136.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.3%).