Immigrants from Mexico vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,807,923 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 40.3%), median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $40,299, a difference of 21.2%), and per capita income ($33,931 compared to $40,330, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $85,571, a difference of 0.78%), householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $51,463, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $51,844, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 18.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.41%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.3%), family households with children (31.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 265.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 160.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 114.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 30.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 70.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 114.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 48.3%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 44.2%), and no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.93%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 25.8%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.4%).