Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,662,260 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.688. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $53,359, a difference of 57.3%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $122,764, a difference of 46.8%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $65,518, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $55,932, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $69,774, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 76.2%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.8%), and family poverty (12.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 55.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.6%), currently married (44.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.3%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 151.9%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 140.6%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 114.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.0%).