Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 329,810,363 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.616. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $48,164, a difference of 41.9%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $109,418, a difference of 30.8%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $58,324, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $54,487, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $62,364, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 52.8%), family poverty (12.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.7%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.45%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 71.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 43.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 100.8%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 99.3%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%).