Hopi vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,573,317 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.893. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.447% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to an increase of 447.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,177 compared to $52,074, a difference of 67.0%), median family income ($77,188 compared to $118,440, a difference of 53.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,562 compared to $113,533, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $53,739, a difference of 14.4%), median female earnings ($33,932 compared to $43,308, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,925 compared to $66,891, a difference of 31.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 124.0%), single male poverty (27.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 117.5%), and family poverty (15.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 103.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 21.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 35.8%), and single female poverty (28.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (16.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 132.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (11.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 124.8%), and male unemployment (10.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 115.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (58.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 72.1%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 52.1%), and currently married (36.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.8%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 36.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.3% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 73.8%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 69.2%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 235.5%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.1%).