Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,558,172 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.325% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 324.7 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $52,074, a difference of 36.8%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $118,440, a difference of 34.2%), and median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $62,857, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $53,739, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $43,308, a difference of 20.2%), and wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 79.2%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 64.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.6%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.4%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.6%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households (67.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 90.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 76.4%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.1%).