Costa Rican vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,734,994 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 84.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,090 compared to $52,074, a difference of 18.1%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $62,857, a difference of 15.8%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $118,440, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $53,739, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $66,891, a difference of 8.5%), and median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $43,308, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 20.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.1%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.48%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.7%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.74%).