Dutch vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,268,891 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Dutch communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch corresponds to an increase of 4.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,605 compared to $52,074, a difference of 22.2%), median family income ($101,192 compared to $118,440, a difference of 17.0%), and median household income ($82,971 compared to $96,490, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,265 compared to $53,739, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (29.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,539 compared to $66,891, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.3%), single male poverty (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%), births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.2%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%).