Hispanic or Latino vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,772,384 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,688 compared to $52,074, a difference of 45.9%), median family income ($85,647 compared to $118,440, a difference of 38.3%), and median male earnings ($46,419 compared to $62,857, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $53,739, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $43,308, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 73.6%), receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 64.6%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.0%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.3%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households (67.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 87.6%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 85.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 82.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Australian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.69%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.3%).