Immigrants from Guatemala vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,035,292 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 12.4 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $52,074, a difference of 38.7%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $62,857, a difference of 35.9%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $118,440, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $53,739, a difference of 4.4%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $43,308, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $66,891, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 66.8%), family poverty (12.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.44%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Australian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 121.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 71.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.70%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.0%).