Indian (Asian) vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,874,265 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.439. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Australian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $107,912, a difference of 10.7%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $96,490, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,739, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($53,874 compared to $52,074, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $66,891, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $62,857, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and single female poverty (17.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.070%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 16.9%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.0%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.8% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.9%).