Bangladeshi vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,903,011 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,897 compared to $52,074, a difference of 45.1%), median male earnings ($46,744 compared to $62,857, a difference of 34.5%), and median family income ($88,358 compared to $118,440, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $53,739, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $43,308, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $66,891, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 56.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 39.4%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.9%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 46.1%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.13, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 118.9%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 97.9%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and male disability (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.8%).