Guyanese vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,105,820 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 53.9%), per capita income ($40,949 compared to $52,074, a difference of 27.2%), and median family income ($93,373 compared to $118,440, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $43,308, a difference of 5.7%), and median earnings ($45,470 compared to $52,294, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 73.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 50.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 37.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 190.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 88.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 27.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 60.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 75.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 87.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 73.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%).