Creek vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,594,063 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 21.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $52,074, a difference of 46.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $107,912, a difference of 44.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $113,533, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,739, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $66,891, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 56.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.69%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (64.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 90.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 78.0%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 57.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.7%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.3%).