Kiowa vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,441,271 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 88.6 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $113,533, a difference of 51.7%), per capita income ($35,102 compared to $52,074, a difference of 48.3%), and median family income ($80,885 compared to $118,440, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $53,739, a difference of 20.1%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $43,308, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 60.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 57.9%), and family poverty (12.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 46.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 46.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (61.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 90.9%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 69.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 61.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.9%), and ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.0%).