Icelander vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,867,579 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to a decrease of 18.8 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $52,074, a difference of 15.8%), median family income ($104,282 compared to $118,440, a difference of 13.6%), and median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $62,857, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $53,739, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $66,891, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.0%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.61%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.58%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.0%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%).