Immigrants from Latvia vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,203,163 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.146% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 146.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $66,891, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,739, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $43,308, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($51,555 compared to $52,294, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $113,533, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.10%), poverty (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.6%), family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.050%), family households (62.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.6%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and bachelor's degree (45.1% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.85%).