Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Chippewa
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Chippewa
18.6%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,566,995 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,159,389 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
Minimum | 7.7% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 97.9% |
Mean | 38.3% | 33.0% |
Median | 24.3% | 24.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.8% | 40.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 53.2% | 25.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.7% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.2% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Ottawa (18.6%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Scotch-Irish (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Blackfeet (18.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Ute (18.5%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Chickasaw (19.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hungarians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.5% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |