Alaskan Athabascan vs Arapaho Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Arapaho
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Arapaho
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Arapaho Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,771,465 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 28.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Arapaho |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 19.0% |
| Range | 22.1% | 17.2% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 5.9% |
| Median | 7.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Arapaho by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 0.72%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |