Tsimshian vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Ute

Average
Fair
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,251,348 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.955. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.136% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 136.5 Ute.
Tsimshian Integration in Ute Communities

Tsimshian vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $82,166, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and median family income ($101,543 compared to $87,596, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,899, a difference of 0.13%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $41,051, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $49,997, a difference of 9.3%).
Tsimshian vs Ute Income
Income MetricTsimshianUte
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
27.8%

Tsimshian vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 90.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 59.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.8%).
Tsimshian vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianUte
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.7%

Tsimshian vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 95.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 62.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Tsimshian vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianUte
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%

Tsimshian vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Tsimshian vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
76.6%

Tsimshian vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 27.7%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Tsimshian vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianUte
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Poor
33.0%

Tsimshian vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.1%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.8%).
Tsimshian vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianUte
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
8.8%

Tsimshian vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.4%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.4%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%).
Tsimshian vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianUte
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.0%

Tsimshian vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 179.9%), ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Tsimshian vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianUte
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%