Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Immigrants from Lithuania

Average
Exceptional
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,180,827 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $63,346, a difference of 29.7%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $51,361, a difference of 27.3%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $52,769, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $55,028, a difference of 0.69%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $43,317, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $108,149, a difference of 10.6%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
28.6%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 70.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.5%), single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.2%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 165.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 77.1%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.2%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
83.9%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.3%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 52.0%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
27.7%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.6%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 75.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 62.2%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and 11th grade (94.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 90.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 74.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.5%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%