Tsimshian vs Sudanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Sudanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Sudanese
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sudanese Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,648,902 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.176% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 3,176.2 Sudanese.
Tsimshian vs Sudanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $46,982, a difference of 16.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $84,401, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $78,529, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $58,281, a difference of 0.14%), wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $44,419, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Sudanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $41,695 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $96,783 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $78,529 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $44,419 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $51,216 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $38,215 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $46,982 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $84,401 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $93,718 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $58,281 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Tsimshian vs Sudanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 62.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Sudanese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 23.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 18.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 30.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Fair 12.0% |
Tsimshian vs Sudanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 201.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 96.0%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Sudanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Tsimshian vs Sudanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Sudanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 68.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 42.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Excellent 83.0% |
Tsimshian vs Sudanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 30.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Sudanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 60.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Fair 32.4% |
Tsimshian vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Sudanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Tragic 53.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Tsimshian vs Sudanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.9%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Sudanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Good 66.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Good 47.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Tsimshian vs Sudanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 112.2%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 60.7%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Sudanese |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Good 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |