Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Yugoslavians

Average
Good
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yugoslavian Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,646,121 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.968. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 35.3 Yugoslavians.
Tsimshian Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.8%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $53,967, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $51,028, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $58,243, a difference of 0.070%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,783 compared to $97,558, a difference of 0.80%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $82,186, a difference of 1.4%).
Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Income
Income MetricTsimshianYugoslavian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Fair
$42,792
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Fair
$100,119
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Poor
$82,186
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Fair
$45,846
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Fair
$53,967
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$51,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Poor
$91,368
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Fair
$97,558
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Tragic
$58,243
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
26.7%

Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianYugoslavian
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Good
8.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Good
10.8%
Females
Good
13.1%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.7%

Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 172.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 87.8%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.4%).
Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianYugoslavian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianYugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Good
83.0%

Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 36.7%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.16%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianYugoslavian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Good
30.8%

Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.19%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianYugoslavian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Average
6.3%

Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.2%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and 2nd grade (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.67%).
Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianYugoslavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Poor
1.7%

Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 69.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Tsimshian vs Yugoslavian Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianYugoslavian
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%