Tsimshian vs Argentinean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Argentinean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Argentineans
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Argentinean Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,249,717 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 229.8 Argentineans.
Tsimshian vs Argentinean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,344 compared to $49,862, a difference of 23.6%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $60,117, a difference of 23.1%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $50,399, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $54,154, a difference of 0.91%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $103,111, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $41,952, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Argentinean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Exceptional $112,665 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Exceptional $93,960 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Exceptional $50,399 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Exceptional $60,117 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Exceptional $41,952 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $54,154 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Exceptional $103,111 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Exceptional $110,103 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Exceptional $65,246 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian vs Argentinean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 45.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father poverty (12.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Argentinean |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 27.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tsimshian vs Argentinean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 161.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 76.5%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Argentinean |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.3% |
Tsimshian vs Argentinean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Argentinean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Tragic 33.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 73.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Tsimshian vs Argentinean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.7%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.68%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Argentinean |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 30.0% |
Tsimshian vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Argentinean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Poor 54.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Tsimshian vs Argentinean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 86.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 62.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.93%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Argentinean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Excellent 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Exceptional 63.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 51.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Tsimshian vs Argentinean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 102.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 78.3%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.0%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Argentinean |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |