Tsimshian vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Malaysians

Average
Fair
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,954,833 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 19.5 Malaysians.
Tsimshian Integration in Malaysian Communities

Tsimshian vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $88,291, a difference of 10.8%), median family income ($101,543 compared to $95,230, a difference of 6.6%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $37,298, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $58,244, a difference of 0.070%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $43,844, a difference of 0.34%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,783 compared to $94,517, a difference of 2.4%).
Tsimshian vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricTsimshianMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Excellent
25.0%

Tsimshian vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 55.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.24%), poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Tsimshian vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianMalaysian
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Good
8.8%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.7%

Tsimshian vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 150.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 83.2%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Tsimshian vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianMalaysian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Fair
5.5%

Tsimshian vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Tsimshian vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
82.0%

Tsimshian vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 24.4%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Tsimshian vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianMalaysian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
33.9%

Tsimshian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.4%).
Tsimshian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Tsimshian vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.0%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Tsimshian vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Tsimshian vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 86.4%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and ambulatory disability (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Tsimshian vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianMalaysian
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%