Tsimshian vs Brazilian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Brazilian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Brazilians
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Brazilian Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,879,314 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 32.0 Brazilians.
Tsimshian vs Brazilian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $56,837, a difference of 16.4%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $46,700, a difference of 15.8%), and wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $98,267, a difference of 0.47%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $54,335, a difference of 0.58%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $40,483, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Brazilian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Exceptional $46,700 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Excellent $106,942 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Exceptional $88,934 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Exceptional $48,356 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Exceptional $56,837 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Excellent $40,483 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $54,335 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Excellent $98,267 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Excellent $104,408 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Good $61,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 26.7% |
Tsimshian vs Brazilian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 42.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.74%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Brazilian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Good 11.9% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Excellent 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Excellent 15.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Poor 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Excellent 11.1% |
Tsimshian vs Brazilian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 153.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 76.5%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Brazilian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Tsimshian vs Brazilian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Brazilian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Tsimshian vs Brazilian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 38.7%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Brazilian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Good 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Fair 46.2% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Average 6.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Excellent 30.4% |
Tsimshian vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Brazilian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Tragic 53.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Tsimshian vs Brazilian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 56.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.90%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Brazilian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Good 93.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Good 60.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Tsimshian vs Brazilian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.4%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.96%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.2%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Brazilian |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |