Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,450,336 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 28.1 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,344 compared to $43,997, a difference of 9.0%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $52,860, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $91,171, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,783 compared to $96,086, a difference of 0.73%), median household income ($83,346 compared to $82,560, a difference of 0.95%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $38,945, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.0%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father poverty (12.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 158.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 77.9%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.4%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 95.9%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 71.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%).