Indian (Asian) vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,615,651 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $30,256, a difference of 78.1%), median family income ($125,312 compared to $72,193, a difference of 73.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $69,068, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 19.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $45,248, a difference of 28.7%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $33,205, a difference of 40.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 164.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 141.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 137.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 48.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 50.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 58.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 95.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 92.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 91.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 100.6%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 97.3%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 78.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.53, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 129.2%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 110.7%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 99.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 118.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 89.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.4%).