Indian (Asian) vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,743,271 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $36,651, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $83,937, a difference of 45.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $82,166, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $49,997, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $52,949, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 75.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 63.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 55.4%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.1%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 74.5%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 62.3%), and bachelor's degree (47.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.3%).