Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 489,703,047 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 39.8 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $36,823, a difference of 46.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $82,166, a difference of 45.4%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $86,989, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 11.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $51,387, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $35,307, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 62.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 57.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.69%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 54.9%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 47.0%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.42, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 123.2%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 97.7%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 81.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.91%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.5%).