Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Indian (Asian)
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Indians (Asian)

Celtics

Good
Average
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Indian (Asian) Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,026,084 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Celtics.
Indian (Asian) Integration in Celtic Communities

Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $92,241, a difference of 29.5%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $83,193, a difference of 26.5%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $101,139, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $50,447, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $60,608, a difference of 15.9%).
Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Income
Income MetricIndian (Asian)Celtic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$53,874
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,312
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,262
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,253
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$66,078
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,481
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,239
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,496
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,343
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,238
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.90%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.8%).
Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricIndian (Asian)Celtic
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.8%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Excellent
10.9%

Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIndian (Asian)Celtic
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.4%

Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 29.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIndian (Asian)Celtic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.9%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
81.8%

Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 31.8%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (65.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIndian (Asian)Celtic
Family Households
Exceptional
65.1%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.3%
Poor
33.3%

Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 74.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 7.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 11.4%).
Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIndian (Asian)Celtic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.1%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.1%

Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.3%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.6%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricIndian (Asian)Celtic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.8%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.4%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.5%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.9%
Good
1.9%

Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
Indian (Asian) vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricIndian (Asian)Celtic
Disability
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%