Indian (Asian) vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,827,995 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $98,586, a difference of 21.2%), per capita income ($53,874 compared to $45,804, a difference of 17.6%), and median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $56,302, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.53%), householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $51,259, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.2%), single male poverty (11.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.49%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.2%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and female disability (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.5%).