Indian (Asian) vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,164,741 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $39,870, a difference of 35.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $91,624, a difference of 30.4%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $97,288, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $52,365, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $38,528, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 45.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.4%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 91.6%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 83.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.5%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.1%).