Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,132,596 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 9.0 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $94,042, a difference of 27.1%), median family income ($125,312 compared to $100,414, a difference of 24.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $99,126, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $54,268, a difference of 7.3%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $39,643, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.5%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.78%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.87%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.5%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.40%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%).