Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from West Indies Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,745,911 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from West Indies within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from West Indies. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from West Indies.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $88,164, a difference of 38.8%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 37.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $87,063, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $51,479, a difference of 13.1%), median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $39,441, a difference of 17.8%), and median earnings ($56,253 compared to $43,989, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 67.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 55.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.3%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 43.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 55.1%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 52.7%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.1% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 46.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 8.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 91.4%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.22%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.7%).