Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,306,572 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $102,020, a difference of 17.1%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $92,098, a difference of 14.3%), and median earnings ($56,253 compared to $49,722, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $65,715, a difference of 6.9%), and per capita income ($53,874 compared to $48,844, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.34%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 22.9%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.76%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 61.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.1%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%).