Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Community Comparison
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Cuban
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Cubans
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cuban Integration in Indian (Asian) Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,452,094 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 9.1 Cubans.
Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($125,312 compared to $84,981, a difference of 47.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $81,483, a difference of 46.7%), and per capita income ($53,874 compared to $37,383, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $50,655, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $34,942, a difference of 33.0%).
Income Metric | Indian (Asian) | Cuban |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $53,874 | Tragic $37,383 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,312 | Tragic $84,981 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,262 | Tragic $73,392 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,253 | Tragic $40,619 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $66,078 | Tragic $46,580 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,481 | Tragic $34,942 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,239 | Tragic $50,655 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,496 | Tragic $81,483 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,343 | Tragic $86,301 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,238 | Tragic $49,152 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 23.3% |
Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 89.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.6%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.1%).
Poverty Metric | Indian (Asian) | Cuban |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.6% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 17.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.9% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.8% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Indian (Asian) | Cuban |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Labor Participation Metric | Indian (Asian) | Cuban |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 31.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.9% | Tragic 72.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 55.9%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 42.2%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (65.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Indian (Asian) | Cuban |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Exceptional 67.7% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Poor 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 45.4% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.3% | Tragic 39.4% |
Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 65.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Indian (Asian) | Cuban |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.0% | Exceptional 91.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 111.3%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 69.4%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Indian (Asian) | Cuban |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 94.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 91.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Tragic 90.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 85.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.8% | Tragic 58.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.8% | Tragic 41.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.4% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Indian (Asian) vs Cuban Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.2%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Indian (Asian) | Cuban |
Disability | Exceptional 10.3% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 10.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |