Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,043,080 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to a decrease of 56.0 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.4%), per capita income ($41,853 compared to $48,164, a difference of 15.1%), and median family income ($95,647 compared to $109,418, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $41,273, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $54,487, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,198 compared to $49,463, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.7%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.6%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.3%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.8%).