Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,599,195 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.144% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 144.1 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,647 compared to $118,325, a difference of 23.7%), per capita income ($41,853 compared to $51,368, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $114,407, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $52,503, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $44,066, a difference of 12.9%), and wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.1%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.5%).