Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,908,246 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.143% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to a decrease of 143.3 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,451 compared to $118,056, a difference of 32.0%), median family income ($95,647 compared to $125,150, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $122,222, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $57,123, a difference of 11.4%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $46,502, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 46.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.5%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.12%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.8%), no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 86.4%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 60.5%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.0%).