Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,792,856 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.345% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 345.1 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,647 compared to $104,966, a difference of 9.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $102,190, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $61,843, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $52,611, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $40,704, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($41,853 compared to $44,187, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.3%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 39.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.57%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.0%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.2%).