Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,502,274 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.637. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.683% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to a decrease of 683.1 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $116,566, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,451 compared to $110,787, a difference of 23.8%), and median family income ($95,647 compared to $118,291, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $56,379, a difference of 10.0%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $44,198, a difference of 13.2%), and wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.7%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.8%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.15%), family households (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%).